tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5755087349201445537.post4940673099392091218..comments2023-12-06T06:36:07.648-05:00Comments on Suburban Sheepdog: . . . could be raining.Robert Kuntzhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08629632558320667302noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5755087349201445537.post-70086228745479752202011-02-26T01:48:44.597-05:002011-02-26T01:48:44.597-05:00I stand corrected, and honored to meet the author ...I stand corrected, and honored to meet the author of so wise a treatise as the Robert's Rules of THIS order. So Robert's Rules it is.<br /><br />Thanks for noticing. I'll try to check in again. --DugoAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5755087349201445537.post-72859830378003219602011-02-25T15:15:29.988-05:002011-02-25T15:15:29.988-05:00We speak here of Robert's Rules. I understand ...We speak here of Robert's Rules. I understand there is some other, more obscure Robert who may at one time have had something or other to say on the subject of orderly meetings. No doubt a fine fellow and a worthy effort. But I am the Robert of these far more useful, universally applicable rules.<br /><br />Thanks for coming over from GT, and for commenting.Robert Kuntzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08629632558320667302noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5755087349201445537.post-80530249755818041862011-02-25T14:05:39.800-05:002011-02-25T14:05:39.800-05:00More than agree. This sounds so crazy that I have...More than agree. This sounds so crazy that I have to believe (well, at least hope) that there is more to the story. If not, I fear you may be inclined in the right direction with contemplations about some nefarious scheme.<br /><br />However, I am still in denial, I guess, and look for some justification upon which to hang the hat of reason. Wish me luck (as I may need it).<br /><br />By the way, was it Robert's or Murphy's? IIRC, Roberts are rules of a different order.<br /><br />(Thanks for the link. --dugo, from GT)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com