“Experience,” baseball philosopher Vernon Law famously said,
“is a hard teacher, because she gives the test first, the lesson afterwards.” Oxford
don philosopher C.S. Lewis put it like this: “Experience: that most brutal of
teachers. But you learn, my God do you learn.”
The ballplayer, who was merely characterizing experience, turns out always to be right. The don, predicting its effect, sadly, isn’t. It turns out that the modern human capacity for ignoring hard-taught lessons is profound. You will be able to watch this play out in the next few days as the world assesses the lessons from the mosque shootings in New Zealand. Predictably, most folks will “learn” the exact lesson that best suits what they already believe. Those convinced that evil arises from the barrel of gun will “learn” that lesson again, ignore all others, and fight to force it on all and sundry. Those inclined to attribute mystical, evil, trans-global powers to politicians they despise will “learn” that the political leaders they despise have mystical,evil, trans-global powers, ignoring all other possible motives and means.*
Those of us who take the world as it comes, who try to be
clear-eyed about the lesson the harsh schoolmistress teaches, must do better. We have learned here before. In the most terrible way imaginable, we have been brought to class by a unique
teacher.
For what has to have been the first time, the shooter in the
first mosque wore a camera. Despite the best efforts of benighted officials
seeking to repress this vital tool, I’ve seen it. I watched its nearly 17
horrific minutes four times before the link was sent where governments often send hard
truths. Because while it is horrible,** it is true. It is the truest thing you
will ever see. And it has lessons to teach.
Observe: The shooter was able to approach from down the
block and enter the building unchallenged while in full tactical gear and
carrying two long guns.
Lesson: Live in Condition Yellow
Observe: He passed several members of the mosque, who did
not even call out.
Lesson: SEE something so you can say
something.
Observe: He entered through an open gate and an open
exterior door. (The side exterior doors to the Mosque were also open.) The shooter then walked up and down the same hallway repeatedly, but never even tried the
several doors on either side of the hallway where other worshipers were hiding.
Lesson: Get a door between you and
the shooter. Lock the door if you can.
Observe: The shooter was on scene for six minutes, returning once to
his car down the block to retrieve another weapon and more ammunition, then re-entering the mosque. There was no police
response while the shooter was on scene. After a second entry to the Mosque,
the shooter went back to his car and drove calmly away.
Lesson: You have to solve the problem
without the police. You are your own first responder, and likely the only one who can be there on time.
Observe: No one made any attempt to intervene with him, to attack him, to get inside his OODA Loop. (One worshiper ran into him as the worshiper tried to flee, but made no
effort to disarm the shooter.) This despite the fact there were multiple
opportunities to engage the shooter during many clumsy reloads and many
malfunctions he had with his weapons. He frequently turned his back on his
victims. He walked blindly through openings.
Lesson:
Mass shooters will provide opportunities for violence of action. Take advantage
of them. You're probably going to die, so take your best shot.
Observe: Most victims died cowering in corners. The shooter
shot everyone he could see – many times. Needless to say, no one was able to
exchange fire with the shooter, because New Zealand largely disarms its citizens.
Lesson:
You - and you only - are responsible for your own safety.
Lesson:
You have to stop the shooter, because the shooter won’t stop until he’s done.
Observe: The shooter was, in fact, very poorly trained if
trained at all. He charged into rooms, he had lousy target awareness, he turned his back on people who should have been threats to his safety, he could not clear a failure-to-feed,
fumbled reloads, and more. An armed worshiper with even minimal training and the right mindset would
have been more than a match for him.
Lesson:
Have a gun. Carry the gun. Get trained with the gun. Be prepared – morally,
spiritually, physically – to employ the gun to save your life and others’
lives.
Observe: We know the point above is correct because this
shooter’s accomplice DID encounter armed resistance at the second mosque. A
worshiper (likely “illegally” armed given New Zealand’s laws) fired at the
shooter there and that shooter instantly abandoned his attack.
Lesson:
Armed resistance stops mass shooters.
* I was able to come back twelve hours after this post originally went up and add links demonstrating exactly my point. That Chelsea Clinton and Donald Trump were both credited with such powers makes the point an even finer one.
** And it is utterly horrific. Human bodies piled like snow drifts in
the corners. The impact of shotgun rounds striking skulls. The shooter’s cavalier, flippant
commentary as scores die crying out for mercy. You should watch it. Because it’s true. But I
won’t think less of you if you can’t. The lessons are still the lessons, but
they do burn in a bit more deeply with the viewing.
Powerful writing, dad. Do you have the link to the video? It might be hard, but I think I should see it.
ReplyDeleteWhat a wonderful read. Took a few pointers from this great article.
ReplyDeleteMr. Kuntz, you are a fine writer, and your point seems to be well meaning. But I wonder if, like so many others, the lessons you learned are just the lessons you already knew. I'm not sure what the lessons to be drawn from this incident are. But I did not learn what you learned - likely, because I did not already believe what you believe. I look forward to reading more of your posts.
ReplyDeleteFirst, thank you for reading and commenting.
DeleteI guess I would respond by saying the lessons above aren't meant to be philosophical, but purely practical.
With what in particular did you disagree?
I guess I disagree with the general premise of your post.
DeleteViolence begets violence. And having more guns, and training more people to use guns, won't solve gun violence.
Plus, I don't want to live in a society in which I have to live in fear (i.e. condition yellow), isolate myself (i.e. building more walls and locking more doors), or be suspicious of people who don't fit into my ideas of normality (i.e. see something, say something).
I prefer to live in a free and open society, to accept some risk associated with that freedom, and also to accept the reasonable and common sense regulation on the ownership of devices whose sole purpose is death.*
In that context, it seems much more practical to get rid of most guns (maybe leave single-shot bolt-action rifles, and double barrel shot guns for rural hunting and/or in-home defense; maybe) than to adopt the lessons that you have suggested we learn.
* I have always found it interesting that the gun lobby and those supportive of so-called gun rights see gun registration, forced insurance, and licensing as some kind of societal ill, but have no apparent objection to the same regulation of cars. (I don't know your position on this, and it is only partially related to the post, so I leave it as a footnote.)
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteLet me see if I can reclaim with more brevity the lengthy response I just lost to a glitch:
We would all PREFER a world without violence. But no such world exists this side of glory. So you have to see the world for what it is and choose. Which image do you prefer:
The image of a woman with a smoking gun in her hand, standing over the body of her would-be rapist.
OR
The image a raped and bloody woman lying on the ground as her attacker flees.
The image of the bodies of the Muslim faithful piled like snowdrifts in the corners of their mosque, as the gunman drives happily away, prattling his mad justifications into his video stream.
OR
The body of that gunman lying outside the mosque while the faithful – stunned but alive – gather to give thanks for having survived.
Those are the choices. And you are free to make them for yourself and your family. But the moment you try to make those choices for me and mine, by depriving me of the means to defend us, that makes you my enemy.
Even so, thanks for reading an commenting. I’m afraid if you visit other posts on this blog, you’ll find much to dislike.
And there you go. I do not accept the premise of your choices. Nor do I accept the proposed conclusions of the actions implied in those choices. The over-simple conclusions that you draw are fanciful. They read like the conclusions of a boy who read too many stories about heroes, and wants desperately to be one.
DeleteI am not your enemy (what a world we live in when a man can be thought another's enemy for believing that more guns in circulation means more guns will be used).
You also talk about the choices that people make impacting others. Indeed. Your choice to buy guns and support the "right to bear arms" makes society (and by implication, my family) less safe. I support your right to hold your position, despite the fact that it makes me and my family less safe, and do not believe you to be my enemy for your position.
Good day to you, sir.